<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: <![CDATA[Harry McCracken on the New Kindle →]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenclark.me/2010/07/harry-mccracken-on-the-new-kindle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link><![CDATA[http://technologizer.com/2010/07/28/new-amazon-kindle/]]></link>
	<description>a technology journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://kenclark.me/2010/07/harry-mccracken-on-the-new-kindle/comment-page-1/#comment-14150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenclark.me/?p=2096#comment-14150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ken, I agree with you. Eventually, I believe that Kindle-type devices will own the paperback book market. But, I wish they could meet my needs better.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, I agree with you. Eventually, I believe that Kindle-type devices will own the paperback book market. But, I wish they could meet my needs better.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Clark</title>
		<link>http://kenclark.me/2010/07/harry-mccracken-on-the-new-kindle/comment-page-1/#comment-14149</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenclark.me/?p=2096#comment-14149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jon,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d say you aren&#039;t in the target market, then. It&#039;s really designed for the person who does a lot of long form text reading and I&#039;d argue that for that use case, it is pretty tough to beat.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,<br /><br />I&#39;d say you aren&#39;t in the target market, then. It&#39;s really designed for the person who does a lot of long form text reading and I&#39;d argue that for that use case, it is pretty tough to beat.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://kenclark.me/2010/07/harry-mccracken-on-the-new-kindle/comment-page-1/#comment-14148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenclark.me/?p=2096#comment-14148</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with that device for me is twofold: It reads limited formats and it doesn&#039;t display graphics. I&#039;m very happy with my iPad, but I would consider buying a dedicated reader like the Kindle if I could read all of my books on it. Also important, I would want to use it for PDF manuals, but these often contain diagrams. If most of my reading were paperbacks that had no graphics, I would consider it, but that&#039;s not the majority of my reading.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with that device for me is twofold: It reads limited formats and it doesn&#39;t display graphics. I&#39;m very happy with my iPad, but I would consider buying a dedicated reader like the Kindle if I could read all of my books on it. Also important, I would want to use it for PDF manuals, but these often contain diagrams. If most of my reading were paperbacks that had no graphics, I would consider it, but that&#39;s not the majority of my reading.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

